Newsgroups: alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo
From: James "Kibo" Parry (kibo@world.std.com)
Subject: Re: Al Gore's Open Source Presidential campaign
Battlestar-Galactica-Date: 3096 centons, 67 microns, 0.02 lutefisk
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 03:39:43 GMT
Organization: Stately Kibo Manor
If-You-Read-Headers-You-Might-Read-Anything-So-Have-A-Url: http://www.kibo.com
Mark Hill (mhill@epicentre.net) wrote:
>
> James "Kibo" Parry (kibo@world.std.com) wrote:
> >
> > I figure that a few years from now, President Ventura will be leafing
> > through the FBI's "Dangerous Internet Wackos" file, and ten thousand pages
> > into mine, he'll find that message, which explains that it contains sarcasm,
> > and thus he'll realize that I'm a nice guy and wasn't trying to SECRETLY
> > mock the United States political process, and he'll tear up my file and
> > invite me to have a beer with him on that talking stealth boat he drives
> > on his TV series, "Thunder In Paradise".
>
> Just to expedite the process, I have forwarded the Ventura staff a copy
> of the above article so they will be aware of it when their guy becomes
> President in a couple of years.
Hey! Not a couple. I plan to become President in a couple of years,
after narrowly losing the 2000 election but winning the 2001 election
in a landslide. Ventura will have to be President *AFTER* I leave office,
and since I plan to be President For Life, the only way he'll be able
to get me out will be to BRIBE me to resign. (He can't kill me because
I know I'll still be alive when he's in office because the above article
says so in the flash-forward.)
So, I said "a few years from now" (meaning at least fifty but less than
a hundred) and not "in a couple of years".
Of course, the only problem with this is that Jesse's "Thunder In Paradise"
show -- the one where there's ALWAYS a canal! -- just might get cancelled
by then once the quality degrades.
> Where can I get a copy of the FBI's Dangerous Internet Wackos file? It
> has to be posted on the web someplace, right? Maybe on the Welcome to the
> Gore web site?
I hear that Ross Perot plans on dropping out of the race just because
Gore posted a photo of his daughter nude on his Web site.
Gore, of course, secured such a nudie photo (and thousands of others)
through the use of his perverted new form of HTML which allows it to
actually take a photograph of you any time your Web browser is looking
at his site. It's like a two-way mirror only not so fake-looking.
-- K.
And what do you call Jesse Ventura
when he's wearing bellbottom slacks
with flame coming out the bottoms?
JESSE VENTURI!
I'm sorry, you should see the one
I took out when I thought of that one.
-----------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo
From: James "Kibo" Parry (kibo@world.std.com)
Subject: Re: Al Gore's Open Source Presidential campaign
Battlestar-Galactica-Date: 3096 centons, 67 microns, 0.02 lutefisk
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 06:03:10 GMT
Organization: Stately Kibo Manor
If-You-Read-Headers-You-Might-Read-Anything-So-Have-A-Url: http://www.kibo.com
WARNING! SERIOUS NERD RANT!
Gary Williams (gwms@spectra.net) wrote:
>
> James "Kibo" Parry (kibo@world.std.com) wrote:
> >
> > 12. In the aforementioned
> >
> >
|
> >
> > ...you might want to know that there's no such HTML tag as "",
> > because "" has no content (like
and
, it takes no
> > closing tag.) "" is non-standard, anyway. For broader
> > compatibility, you could use a single-pixel transparent GIF:
> >
> >  |
> >
>
> Why not use ?
I was hoping you might ask that.
You don't EVER want to use in a table for a very good reason.
The W3C specs on how Web browsers are supposed to work say that this is
supposed to happen:
1.) HTML "entities", such as " ", are translated into single characters
in the internal HTML character set (which has a character for the non-
breaking space.)
2.) Then, the page is laid out once all the entities have become single chars.
Here's how some (or all) versions of Mosaic, Netscape Navigator, and
Microsoft Internet Explorer work:
1.) The page is laid out.
2.) The six-character string " " is replaced with one " ".
Why is this bad?
Because they arrange the table cells while " " is six times as long
as it will be when it's drawn.
DUH DUH DUH DUH DUH DUH.
So, in my Netscape, if you have a table that goes all the way across the
screen and a cell is packed with " "s, each cell comes out at least
five characters wider than it should be, and the table sticks out past
the right edge of the window.
In my Internet Explorer, the cells also become too wide, but the table
doesn't get wider, so the cells overlap.
In at least one Mosaic I've seen. " " displays as the characters
"&", "n", "b", "s", "p", and ";" when it's used inside a table.
In other words, all three browsers are broken in the same general manner
but with different specifics -- none of them deals with " " correctly
inside tables (although they can sort of get it right outside of tables.)
And the W3C HTML specs even say exactly how NOT to screw this up. But
because all three of these browsers evolved from Mosaic 1.0, with stuff
like tables piggy-backed on, they just slapped in some table code without
rewriting the browser from scratch to do things in the correct order
(first do the entities, then do the layout).
This is why I think all developers of Web browsers should be given a
firm spanking. By a spanking machine. Designed by the W3C. And the
spanking action would be powered by an eternally-oscillating